When Salesforce announced during its most recent earnings call that it wouldn’t be providing a revenue forecast for next year, it was a bit of a shock, especially coming from the most successful SaaS company in the world.
With revenue of over $7.8 billion for the quarter and a goal of reaching $50 billion by its fiscal 2026, the company hasn’t exactly been doing poorly. Still, when you combine the lack of a forecast with the recent executive exodus, it begins to paint a picture of unusual instability at the CRM giant.
First, let’s look at that forecast — or the lack of one. It seems the economy has become so uncertain that Salesforce opted out of a forecast for its fiscal 2024 altogether (the three months ending October 31, 2022, comprised the third quarter of the company’s fiscal 2023). We use the word unprecedented these days an awful lot, but it’s pretty darn unusual for a company like Salesforce to tell investors they’re punting on a forecast, and it’s the first time the CRM giant has ever done it.
Here’s what Salesforce CFO Amy Weaver told investors during the earnings call:
Before I close, I’d like to share a few thoughts on Fiscal Year ‘24. As discussed, we are experiencing a very unpredictable macro environment, as our customers are working to ensure their businesses are also healthy for the long term. Compounding that dynamic is an unprecedented foreign currency market. Therefore, at this time, we believe it would be premature to provide revenue guidance for the next fiscal year.
That would be enough to make anyone who has followed this company raise their eyebrows. But consider that Salesforce simultaneously dropped the bombshell that co-CEO Bret Taylor plans to step down.
The reason for that exit, ostensibly, was that Taylor was tired of life inside the big corporation and wanted to return to his roots as a company builder — to get back to basics, in other words. But that might not have been the whole story. The Wall Street Journal reported tension between the two leaders and that the resignation might not have come as far out of left field as we were led to believe. (You can pull your jaw off the floor; this is not the first time a company has tried to spin bad news as neutral.)
There were other shoes left to drop. The smaller of the two clogs was Mark Nelson, CEO at Tableau, announcing he was leaving. (Salesforce bought Tableau back in 2019). The more dramatic news item quickly followed: Slack co-founder and CEO Stewart Butterfield told his flock that he wanted to spend less time running a business and more time gardening and taking care of his child.
Slack quickly announced that Lidiane Jones, who had been GM of Salesforce’s Commerce Cloud, Marketing Cloud and Experience Cloud (yes, that’s a lot of clouds), would replace Butterfield.
Let’s not forget that even prior to all of this, Salesforce had to deal with activist investor Starboard Value breathing down its neck, never a comfortable position. (The company stressed its cost-cutting efforts in its latest quarterly call, it’s worth noting.)
On paper, that feels like a lot of disturbing news in a short time. But what does it mean to the underlying financial stability of the company? As part of our year-end roundup at TechCrunch+, we decided to take a peek under the hood and see what’s happening. Is this a short-term glitch in a bad year for all SaaS companies or a series of moves that could be indicative of something more worrisome at Salesforce?
Inside the numbers
We have three goals: First, to look at Salesforce’s recent quarterly performance to see what we can infer about its health. Second, to wonder whether other companies are reporting similar results and forecasts. And, third, to ask if there is a lesson here for us technology watchers, especially regarding startups.